Undoing the Toxic Dogmatism of Digital Design An Essay by Lisa Angela lisa-angela-fftv.medium.com Design educators and industry leaders have never reached a consensus about what comprises a “good enough” foundational education for digital design. We do not properly retire methods (or ways of conducting them) that have been shown to be ineffective. Design team seniority levels are meaningless. We’ve collectively lost the safety (and subsequently the desire) to explore and fail. We afford well-known design leaders too much power to dictate how design is discussed and conducted. We have no ethical standards. Inclusive design and accessibility are afterthoughts — both in design education and in practice. Design Discourse is in a State of Arrested DevelopmentWaking up from the dream of UXSermon for WIAD Bristol 2021On Design Thinking ethicsuxsoftware
ArchDaily A Website www.archdaily.com We began as a platform to collect and spread the most important information for architects seeking to build a better world. Today, we are an ever-evolving tool for anybody who has a passion and determination to shape the world around them, including the 13.6 million readers that visit ArchDaily every month. 125 Best Architecture Books architecture
125 Best Architecture Books Essential Reads Guides Architects, Firms, and Movements Novels History Theory Cities & Urbanism A Pattern LanguageThe Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the SensesThe Image of the CityIn Praise of ShadowsThe Poetics of SpaceSeven lampsCities for PeopleInvisible CitiesBLDGBLOGThe Death and Life of Great American CitiesLife Between BuildingsSoft City